
Federal Court Sets Aside Unlawful PR Refusal
We are delighted to share a significant victory for our client, who faced the unjust refusal of their permanent residency application under the Home Support Worker Pilot.
Our client came to us after IRCC rejected their application, claiming they did not meet the program’s education requirements. The key issue was whether our client’s foreign educational credentials, specifically their Doctor of Dental Medicine degree from their home country, met the program’s requirement that foreign credentials must be equivalent to a completed one-year Canadian post-secondary credential.
As part of their application, our client submitted an Educational Credential Assessment (ECA) report from World Education Services (WES), a designated assessment agency. The report evaluated their degree and stated that it represented four years of professional study in dentistry but did not indicate whether it was comparable to a completed Canadian education credential. Despite this, the immigration officer rejected the application, incorrectly stating that the ECA report had determined the degree was “not comparable” to a Canadian credential.
Our team challenged this decision in Federal Court, arguing that the officer’s decision was flawed and unreasonable, based on a misinterpretation of the WES assessment. We cited previous case law where similar errors had led to successful judicial reviews.
The judge agreed and ordered that the refusal be set aside. Our client’s application will now return to IRCC for a fresh review by a different officer, giving them a renewed opportunity to achieve permanent residency.
We are proud to advocate for those facing unfair immigration decisions and remain committed to ensuring that applicants receive a fair and just review of their cases.